S.260 – “Clarified” Renewable Energy Siting Bill (rules suspension to take up the bill)
Pro-environment vote: YES
The Governor vetoed S.230 due to concerns identified after its enactment that, as drafted, the temporary sound standard for wind projects in the bill was more stringent than the Legislature intended to adopt, and because $300,000 in funding for community energy planning was inadvertently left out of the bill. The House voted on whether to take up a revised version of the bill to fix these problematic provisions.
Status: Motion to suspend rules failed; House vote 79-52; but bill eventually taken up and enacted on a voice vote.